Bob, a guest at a hotel, reached into the front seat of the hotel limousine to get his briefcase. He supported himself by placing his left hand on the center pillar to which the rear door was hinged. A hotel employee closed the rear door, smashing Bob's hand. A part of Bob's left index finger later had to be amputated. Bob filed a negligence lawsuit against the hotel in a state that adopted a "pure" form of comparative negligence. In this case, the court most likely would find that: a. Bob did not contribute to his injury and award him full damages. b. Bob did not contribute to his injury and apportion his damages. c. Bob contributed to his injury and award him nothing in damages. d. Bob contributed to his injury and apportion his damages.