Answer :
Answer:
C. Cross-sectional studies are not good representation of inter-individual differences
Explanation:
Cross sectional research method is not representative enough. if another cross sectional study is conducted, it won't be surprising that the results might show that younger adults perform better than older adults because the representative selected for each age group were just hand picked and it can be used to generalize for the whole younger population.
Older folks did not have the pleasure of using a calculators in the past, thus they developed higher math abilities.
Uses of cross-sectional study:
A cohorts is any group of people who share important documented or social events, such as their birth season.
Cohort impacts are a source of concern for academics in domains such as human science, disease transmission study, and cerebrum research. A pilot study in which people utilize a computer to act out a mental exercise provides an illustration of a cohort effect.
The findings might indicate that people in their 20s performed better on a scholastic test than those in their 60s.So, Option "B" is the correct answer to the following question.
Find out more information about 'Cohort impacts'
https://brainly.com/question/7580591?referrer=searchResults