Answer :
Answer:
C. the employer defamed the former employee because the employer was recklessly indifferent to the truthfulness of the statements made
Explanation:
The simple and straightforward ruling by the court would be that the employer defamed the former employee because the employer was indifférent to the truthfulness or factual correctness of the information given to him.
The court would have clear grounds to give the former employee reprieve because the employer was not suitably interested in seeing company records and was quite content with hearing and basing a judgement based on word of mouth only.
Answer:
C.the employer defamed the former employee because the employer was recklessly indifferent to the truthfulness of the statements made