Answer :
A consequentialist approach to ethics is an approach that claims that the morality of an action depends on its outcome. This means that an action is "good" is the consequence it brings is good as well. An example of such a theory is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism states that an action is morally good if it leads to the most happiness for greatest number of people. However, an objection that can be made to this theory is that utility and happiness are subjective, as well as difficult to measure.
On the other hand, non-consequentialist ethics state that the morality of an action is based on the rightness and wrongness of the actions themselves and not the consequences of those actions. An example of this is the Natural Rights Theory, which states that humans have an inherent right to certain rights, regardless of human behaviour. However, it is unclear who has the right to state what these rights are, which has led to criticism of the theory.
The consequentialist is to ethics that claims mortality of n action. The non consequentialist ethics is that the morality of an action is right and wrong.
What is consequentialist and non-consequentialist?
The consequentialist approach states the ethics that claim that the morality of an action depends on its outcome. This means that an action is "good" is the consequence it brings is good as well. Like the theory is Utilitarianism.
The approach of the non-consequentialist ethics tells morality of the action is the rightness and the wrongness of the actions and not the fault of the actions. The example is the rights theory.
Find out more information about the difference.
brainly.com/question/895136