Answer :
Answer: The Ottoman empire and Mughal empire had both similarities and differences. The two societies used architecture to legitimize their power. A difference is there tolerance towards other religions. Both the Mughals and the Ottoman legitimized their power by building large and beautiful architecture reflecting the religions of their empire.
Their similarity's are they Combined Mughal and Indian aspects of architecture and Domes, minarets, massive halls, large vaulted gateways the one similarity and one difference in the legitimizing and consolidating of power by two of the following empires: Ottoman & Mughals where Architecture drew from both Islamic and European artistic traditions and Minarets, domes, pavilions, halls, fountains
The difference between the two empire was that the Ottomans were not tolerant towards other religions but the Mughals were accepting. They Were tolerant towards other religions in their empire.Plus they where Mainly run by Muslims but allowed Hindus to have government and military positions. A reason for the similarity is that both the Mughals and the Ottomans had Muslims in their empire. This led to the development of Muslim-style architecture such as minarets. The architecture helped to showcase the main religion of the empires, legitimizing power.Another empire that didn't tolerate other religions is the Spanish empire. Christianity was their main religion and they forced conquered people to convert. They also believed that non-catholic Native Americans were savages and worshipped the devil.
Explanation: